For one of Apple’s key marketing strategies is in

For years, Apple has been the benchmark when it comes to an effective
marketing strategy. Apple’s marketing prowess is visible through their brand
equity, which according to Forbe’s is the most valuable brand in the world at $170
billion (Badenhausen, 2017). This represents 21% of the company’s $806 billion
market value. These numbers, alongside the overwhelming rate of growth over the
last 10 years, point towards a company that has pioneered many of the most
effective marketing strategies. This essay will explore the strategies used, by
what looks to be the first company in history, likely to reach a market cap of
$1 trillion.

 

Apple has always had a firm understanding of their market segmentation,
allowing them to target their strategies more effectively. Apple targets three
major groups that all revolve around lifestyle. These include home users,
educators, students and professionals and web designers / publishers. Furthermore,
Apple have tended to target the urban population as these areas tend to be
occupied by individuals with greater purchasing power – the early adopters. However,
distinct from many companies in the industry, Apple actually pursues a somewhat
mono-segment strategy, with fewer devices marketed towards wealthy sections of
society. Indeed, Apple is outsold unit wise compared to Nokia, LG and Samsung 23.5
to 1, yet combined generate 82% of Apple’s profit (Sigal, 2010). This is due to
Apple’s strategy to position their product line as a more premium interface
targeted towards higher-income users. Therefore, one of Apple’s key marketing
strategies is in stressing their unique value proposition rather than competing
in price wars. They do not associate themselves with being competitive on
price, but they do associate themselves with being competitive on value. This pricing
strategy enables them to shift products upwards of twice the price of the
capable competition.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

 

One of Apple’s key marketing strategies has been the use of information
vacuums around product releases. This powerful tool creates aura around Apple
launches, building intrigue, transforming customers into raving fans. Alongside
this, Apple creates further mystery after the launch by holding back on
advertising and instead creating buzz through media and reviews. This was shown
in Apple’s patent litigation with Samsung, where Schiller declared in 2007 that
there was a period following a launch where Apple spent no money on advertising
(Patel). Schiller said, “we don’t need to”, because user stories are more
effective at selling products (Patel). That’s not to say that Apple doesn’t
advertise; they spent $97.5m on adverts to promote the iPhone – Apple’s cash
cow of the BCG Matrix – alone in the US in 2007 (Patel). However, the company’s
ability to create an aura around new products gives them a competitive
advantage over the likes of Microsoft, as they can spend less money on
advertising, and instead build information vacuums, allowing the media to
bridge the gaps with speculation and hype.

 

Another successful marketing strategy used by Apple is product
placement. ABC sitcom, Modern Family, includes an Apple fan called Phil, who
said in an episode: “the iPad comes out on my actual birthday. It’s like God
and Steve Jobs got together and said, ‘We love you, Phil'” (Nield, 2015). Apple
has a powerful grip on Hollywood, with products represented in 891 TV shows in
2011 alone (Nield, 2015). Interestingly, Apple claims they don’t pay for such
placement and instead issue endless amounts of devices. Director of Worldwide
Brand Marketing for Apple in 1990, Jon Holtzman, pioneered product placement long
before the competition. He described it as a way of getting the brand in front
of millions of people at “very little cost” (Souer, 2017). When displaying
updates to the executives within Apple, Holtzman could remind them of the fact
that Apple only had “10% market share of PCs sold, but 90% market share of the
silver screen” (Souer, 2017). This competitive advantage has remained with
Apple, with representation in 42.5% of the top US movies in 2011 alone (Nield,
2015).

 

Apple approach marketing differently to their competition by creating
experiences rather than products. The product launches are akin to a rock
concert, with Apple featuring performers like U2. Apple uses story telling and
sensory dimensions to immerse the customer in the keynotes, with a subtle marketing
strategy that focuses on emotion. Marketing consultant, Simon Sinek, explains
how Apple and Microsoft can have access to the same resources but achieve
drastically different results (Sinek, 2010). Sinek argues that Apple’s success comes
from the notion that “people don’t buy what you do, they buy why you do it.”
People make decisions emotionally and justify them with logic afterwards. This
is supported by the anatomy of the brain. The limbic system of the brain
contains the amygdala, which controls decision-making (Sinek, 2010). The
amygdala’s also the emotion centre of the brain, supporting the idea that
people make decisions based on feeling and rationalise them with logic
thereafter. Apple creates loyalty in their followers in the same way that Martin
Luther King did. His speech that raised 250,000 people from around America
began not with “I have a plan”, but with “I have a dream” (King, 1963).  In the example of Apple’s newest creation –
the iPhone X – Apple don’t market the phone’s new screen size by describing its
dimensions, but instead by using emotive language: “our vision has always been
to create an iPhone that is entirely screen. One so immersive the device itself
disappears into the experience.” This line of argument inspires a buying decision
in consumers, and loyalty in users, by appealing not to logic but to emotion.

 

Logic creates customers, but emotion creates evangelists. Steve Jobs was
such a master at marketing because he was able to articulate his vision
effectively. His passion was so contagious that the phenomenon – Reality
Distortion Field (RDF) – was coined by Bud Tribble to describe his ability to
distort the perceptions of Apple consumers and colleagues (Fierberg, 2017). Apple’s
ability to weave the brand into the fabric of everyday life extends beyond
creating loyal customers, and may also impact the way in which users think, as
was found in a study done at Duke University’s Fuqua School when comparing
Apple to IBM (Sawyer, 2011). Providing consumers with a fundamental feeling of creativity
helps fuel the “App lifestyle”, and level of integration that Apple consumers
exhibit over the company’s various platforms. This would explain why Apple has
the highest brand retention rate of any smartphone at 92% compared to just 42%
for Nokia; the experience associated with using the product (a feeling of
creativity) results in consumers that don’t just buy iDevices once, but
continue to buy them again in the future (Gottsegen, 2017). 

 

Apple’s use of simplicity over complex jargon has been a lucrative
marketing strategy that has become more refined in recent years. Apple’s latest
YouTube video release – “Meet iPhone X – Apple” reached over 20 million views
in just 2 months and doesn’t contain a single spoken word besides the initial
music. Research by CEB found that businesses that streamline consumer decision
making are 86% more likely to be purchased, so Apple focuses on powerful
minimalism and strong visuals, with the only colours being the ones that
resonate from experiences that users are pictured having (DeMers, 2014). Apple
are aware of a concept that neuroscientists call Inattentional deafness,
whereby people who are focusing on a visual activity can’t hear their
surroundings, because hearing and vision use the same physical region of the
brain (Venosa, 2015). By applying such principles, Apple can create gripping
commercials using dynamic imagery that encourages consumers to want to know
more.

 

Apple has come a long way in marketing and branding since the company
first started taking products to market in the late 1980s. Back then, Apple
would focus on marketing the specifics of products like Macintosh, and there
was a dichotomy between Apple products and the Apple brand, with many people thinking
Macintosh was its own distinct company (Souer, 2017). While having a good
product is an essential backbone to the success of Apple, the idea that the
product comes first is an out-dated marketing idea (Clifford, 2014). There are
very few things that iDevices do that the competition can’t. However, Apple’s
competition is becoming increasingly rigorous which puts a question mark over
the company’s ability to sustain long-term growth. Apple’s TV advertising has
recently fallen behind the likes of Samsung, with Ace Metrix – a company that ranks
consumers responses to ads on a scale of 0-950 – reporting Apple’s average to
be 522, far below the industry average of 603 (Metrix, 2016). That said, in the
future Apple is looking to expand into India where the smartphone industry is
growing rapidly, using a distribution strategy that has increased enormously
since 2002; 498 outlets in 19 countries provide the company with a substantial street
presence (Dunn, 2017). Their sheer tangible assets, brand equity and market
share of almost 20% of global smartphone sales, suggests that Apple’s total domination
is unlikely to change any time soon.